Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The Failure of American Politicians

If you have been elected to a public office in the past decade you have let the American people down. It doesn't matter if you are Democrat, Republican or Independent. Right Wing, Left Wing or Centrist. Capitalist, Socialist or Communist. It doesn't matter, you have failed the American people and you have failed at what you were elected to do. You were elected to run the greatest, most prosperous country in the world and to keep it the greatest and most prosperous country in the world. You have failed. Why have we failed?

Our forefathers set up a Democracy where a two and sometimes three party system evolved. An exchange of ideas was supposed to take place and a compromise was supposed to be reached that would benefit and be for the good of the American people. All parties were working for the good of the American people. Since the Nixon administration our government has been degenerating into a bunch of spoiled school children that don't care about anything but themselves. Our Professional Politicians are more worried about filling their war chests for the next election than they are about the issues at hand. They need to take care of lobbyist and special interest groups who have money that can be funneled into their campaigns for reelection. Pork barrel and earmarks stall and overwhelm our economy not for the good of the majority of people but for the good of the politician and his wealthy influential friends.

Filibusters have reached an all time high where over 80% of all Bills in the past year were filibustered by the Republicans. I hear the Democrats rubbing their hands together waiting for me to pounce on their obstructionist opponents. Not today. Filibusters have been on a rise for the past decade which means that the Democrats started filibustering more and more Bills while they were the minority party during the Bush years. The Republicans have just taken it a step farther than the Democrats. Is the filibuster being done for the good of the American people? NOOOO. It is being done trying to disgrace the opposite party, so in the next election the Professional Politician can claim that the other party didn't get anything accomplished. In reality nobody accomplished anything other than take a paycheck out of my pocket.

No Politician is concerned about the American people any more and that is why we are in the mess we are in. They are too concerned about keeping their jobs and not about the issues. Politicians are not graded on their performance. They are graded on their looks and on how much money they can raise for their next campaign. Very few times does a candidate with less money in their war chest, than their opponent, win an election.

Voting along party lines does not help the American people either. It is done to preserve the Ideals of the radical Right and the radical Left. Most Professional Politicians come from the far Right or the far Left there are very few true centrists in politics. Yet I believe that around 70% of the American population falls somewhere in the middle, with 15% each going to the extreme Right or Left. So why don't these Professional Politicians do what would be good for 70% of the country and find some middle ground to agree on? Because they need the party backing for their next election. Independents don't usually win elections as is evident by the lack of number of them.

Most politicians are not good businessmen as is evident by the number of bankruptcies filed by congressmen and senators. So why are we entrusting these men with Trillions of dollars with no consequences if they fail to spend the money wisely, when they can't even take care of their own finances. Most politicians as a matter of fact are Attorneys not businessmen.

I think we need to get rid of PERS and have all public employees be dependent on Social security like the rest of us. I feel that all congressmen and senators should have to purchase their own health insurance like a private contractor has to. Any laws passed by Congress and the Senate should pertain to the politicians who pass them as well as all the rest of Americans. Lets stop letting Politicians who are not affected by certain laws vote on these issues. If they have such good ideas on what we need, then how come they are not covered by the same retirement system and insureance as we the people are? What makes them so special? Why don't they like the plans they have stuck us with? Things have got to change.

Any politician that votes strictly along party lines needs to be voted out of office. Any politician that filibusters more than one Bill in a two year period needs to be voted out of office. any politician that has been involved with a company that has filed for bankruptcy or personally has filed for bankruptcy needs not to be elected. Any politician that tries to insert pork into a Bill or earmark funds that only benefit a few rather than the majority of people needs to be voted out of office. If you have the chance to vote for a businessman over a Professional Politician please do it. Until our elected officials start compromising, talking across the aisle and voting for Bills that are for the good of the majority of people and not the special interest and the minority of people America will remain on the brink of collapse. If things don't change soon we all better call Rosetta Stone and learn how to speak Mandarin Chinese.

2 comments:

  1. This was sent to me via e-mail from my firend Joe; Your last paragraph hits it square on the head and your stats on the use of the filibuster provision are slightly off. Historically the Democrats and predecessors the "wig" party, used the filibuster more than any other group/political party. The failure to pass comprehensive legislation was one of the reason for the start of the civil war and the filibuster was the means by which most of the log jams were initiated. Also, please keep in perspective that the filibuster can also achieve a good outcome - case in point - the rush to push through healthcare reform. The current legislation was not understood, not even completely reviewed and/or read, by the majority of the senate or congress. Yet the executive branch wanted to push through a piece of legislation that it didn't competly understand. Unfotunately party lines were drawn and no middle ground was reached to get some aspect of needed reform passed. The only way to slow the process down and prevent putting in play, what appeared to be, a horrible and dramatic change was via the use of the filibuster by the Republicans.

    My Answer was; Joe according to my research the filibuster was used more this past year than any other one year period in history. The filibuster has been growing as a means of stalling the political party in charge for the past decade. If both parties persist in these stall techniques rather than working on a solution we are all screwed. I am not pointing a finger at one party, I am pointing my finger at all parties. It is time to put the pettiness behind us and get to work on repairing the country

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amen I say to you brother! The scenario laid out by you is also present outside of government affairs. It's called Labor and Management. These two parties, much like the LEFT and RIGHT simply and oftentimes disagree, because to agree with the "enemy" would with the other side would be treason. So instead if finding some common ground, both sides are bull headed and the end result is the same. The low man, union or non union gets the short end of the deal. He is laid off, he is let go, he is downsized. I would rather lose my job, or have my buddy down the line lose his job instead of finding some common ground. These crazy scenarios play out every day all over this country. The players change but the results are all to often the same, one side wins. People, individuals not RIGHT, LEFT, UNION, MANAGEMENT have to start taking personal responsibility for thier actions, as those actions may have an equal and opposite reaction. You are either part of the solution or part of the problem. My .02 worth, your milage may vary.

    ReplyDelete